In this article, different methods of family planning are introduced and then the jurisprudential ruling of each one is stated according to available jurisprudential sources. In general, family planning methods are divided into four main groups according to the mechanism of action: 1) Some methods prevent the coagulation of sperm and the formation of an embryo, and their use does not have any Shariah problems per se. 2) The methods that destroy the fertilized sperm and their use is prohibited and haram according to the jurists of the Imamiyyah and some other Islamic schools of thought. Of course, in this discussion and investigation, it has been shown that non-Imami sects have not presented a valid reason for ruling on the sanctity of aborting the fetus before the soul is breathed. 3) methods whose mechanism of action is not exactly known; That is, they prevent the formation of sperm in the first place, and in case of failure at this stage, they cause the destruction of the formed embryo in the next place, which does not prevent the use of this method according to the principle of innocence, although it is better than this. Methods should not be used. 4) Sterilization method that does not have a valid reason for its sanctity. As a result, sterilization is an act that does not have a Shariah prohibition per se.
Machine summary:
"Now, according to this matter, can the dowry be considered as a part of the punishment and by the obligation of the dowry prove that abortion is haram? In response to the question whether the dowry is a punishment for life or a civil penalty or a punishment that is a punishment and it includes Awad, (39) In summary, it can be said: Islamic experts do not agree on this matter that the element of crime and punishment is involved in money, but most of them are of the opinion that it is not involved, so it cannot be definitely considered money as part of punishment. counted;Because the acceptance of this theory requires a valid reason, which is also not available, and as we know, sometimes it is possible that the ransom is obligatory, but no sin has been committed (such as someone who commits a murder or other crime due to a pure mistake), just as it is possible for a person to If he commits a crime and a sin, but the ransom is not obligatory on him (like a person who is an unbeliever who makes an agreement that his work is forbidden, but the ransom is not obligatory on him), then there is no connection between the ransom and the sin.