Matin Research Journal

Matin Research Journal

Relationship between Ethics and Politics in Contemporary Iranian Discourses of Thought

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Thought, Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The history of political thought in Iran has been so far put on paper chiefly in view of the relationship between tradition and modernity. Without exaggeration, it can be claimed that the method of recording political thought has itself turned into a dominant and hegemonic discourse, making it hard for other discourses to emerge. Adopting an analytical-descriptive methodology, this paper tries to shed a new light on Iran’s discourses of thought through investigating the relationship between ethics and politics: political Islam or Islamist discourse, liberalist discourse and Marxist discourse.
Theoretically speaking, there are three forms of relationships between ethics and politics: maximum metaphysics, minimum metaphysics, and no relationship between ethics and politics. Findings of the paper indicate that in view of the relationship between ethics and politics, the Islamist discourse is of maximum metaphysics, hence seeking maximum ethical interference in politics. To that end, Iranian liberalist discourse is of minimum metaphysics favoring least ethical intervention in any aspect of human life. Given certain theoretical foundations constituting its pillars, the Iranian Marxist discourse believes in separation of ethics from politics.
Keywords

Subjects


  • Abrahamian, E. (1998). Iran between two revolutions. Translated by Firouzmand, Shamsavari, Modire- Shanachi, Tehran: Center publication. [In Persian]
  • Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. The University of Chigcago Press.
  • Arendt, H. (2018). Condition De l’Homme Moderne. Calmann Levy.
  • Ashouri, D. (1997). We and Modernity, Tehran: Serat. [In Persian]
  • Ashraf,A. (1980).Historical Obstacles to the Development of Capitalism in Iran in the Qajar Era. Tehran: Zamineh. [In Persian]
  • Bashirieh, H. (2008). Teaching political knowledge: the basics of theoretical and institutional political science. Negahemoaser Publiction. [In Persian]
  • Bazargan, M. (1962). The Border Between Religion and Politics. Tehran: Sherkate-Sahami-Enteshar. [In Persian]
  • Bazargan, M. (1995). The Hereafter and God: The Purpose of Prophets. Kian Monthly, 28, 46-81.
  • Cohen de Lara, Emma and Brouwer. (2017). Aristotle’s Practical Philosophey. Springer International Publishing.

- Eslami, S. H. (2013). The ratio of ethics and politics; Examination of four theories. Political Science, 7(26), 141-162.

  • Foran, J. (1999). Fragile Resistance (History of Iran's Social Developments from the Safavid Period to the Years After the Islamic Revolution). Translated by Ahmad Tadaun, Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services Institute. [In Persian]
  • Gensler, H. (2015). An introduction to contemporary moral philosophy. Translated by Mehdi Akhwan, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
  • Gheissari, A. (2010). Iranian intellectuals in the 20th century. Translated by Mohammad Dehghani, Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian]
  • Gholamreza Kashi, M. J. (1997). Four Models of Establishing the Relationship Between Ethics and Politics, Aein, (13 & 14), 35-39.
  • Homa Katouzian, M. (1998). The Political Economy of Modern Iran. Translated by Mohammad Reza Nafisi, Tehran: Center publication. [In Persian]
  • Jamali, H. & Noorian Dehkordi, N. (2006). Ehsan Tabari's Discourse Paradoxes and Meaningless Modernity. Law and Political Science Research Journal, (6), 61-90.
  • Kalantar Mehrjerdi, A. R. & Khorramshad, M. B. (2016). Political Intellectual Discourses and the Issue of National Identity Before the Islamic Ievolution. Islamic Revolution Approach magazine, (41), 71-96.
  • Keshavarz Baizaei, M. (2012). Reflections on Ehsan Tabari's Epistemological Discourse. Parse magazine,)  20(, 141-160.
  • Machiavelli, N. (1996). The Prince, translated by Dariush Ashuri. Tehran: Center publication. [In Persian]
  • Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2006). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Translated by Mohammad Porhormzan, Berlin: Iran Tudeh Party Publications. [In Persian]
  • Mohammadi Gilani, M. (1999). Islamic ethics lessons. Tehran: Sayeh Publications. [In Persian]
  • Motahari, M. (1995). Imamate and Leadership. Qom: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
  • Motahari, M. (1996). Moral Philosophy, Qom: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
  • Nietzsche, F. (2020). Genealogy of Morality. Translated by Dariush Ashuri, Tehran: Agah publications. [In Persian]
  • Omid, M. (2009).Iranian Marxism's Moral Philosophy and Critical Considerations About it. Marefat Ethical Magazine, 1(4), 47-74.
  • Pippin, R. & Hoffe, O. (2004). Hegel on Ethics and Politics, Cambridge University Press.
  • Plato. (2002). Republic. Translated by Fouad Rouhani, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
  • Qadri, H. & Hajizadeh, J. (2012). The Foundations of Mehdi Bazargan's Political Thoughts - with an Emphasis on the Relationship Between Religion and Politics. Iranian Islamic History Studies Journal, 2(1), 27-46.
  • Qutb، M. (2000). Fundamental Concepts of Islam. Translated by Luqman Mohammad Pour, Ehsan Publishing House, first edition. [In Persian]
  • Rahimi Boroujerdi, A.R (1998). The effect of new foreign exchange policies on foreign trade in Iran. Economic Research Quarterly, 53, 57-86.
  • Rajaei, F. (2015). The identity problem of today's Iranians: playing a role in the era of one civilization and multiple cultures. Tehran: Nei Publishing. [In Persian]
  • Rafipour, F. (1999).Anomie, or Social Disorder: a Research on the Potential of Anomie in Tehran. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
  • Sadat, M. A. (1989). Islamic ethics. Tehran: Samte. [In Persian]
  • Tabatabai, J. (1987).Machiavelli and the Foundation of New Political Though. Keyhane-Farhangi, 4(10).
  • Tabari, E. (1980). Philosophical and social writings, first part. Tehran: Tudeh Party of Iran. [In Persian]
  • Taghi Lo, F. (2004). Review and criticism of the book Ethics of Authenticity: written by Charles Taylor. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, 67, 289-304.
  • Tavsli, G. A. (2010). Sociological Theories. Tehran: Entherat Samte. [In Persian]
  • Vahdat, F. (2004). The intellectual confrontation of Iranians with modernity. Translated by Mehdi Haghighat khah, Tehran: Qoqnos. [In Persian]
  • Yazdi, E. (2008). Both Bazergan Was a Political Liberal and Beheshti and Motahari. Shahrvand, 65. [In Persian]