Machine summary:
"The author is looking for the answer to the fundamental question on which this letter is based: in a comparative study between the method, process and content of the revision of the two constitutions of the Constitution and the Islamic Republic, what similarities and dissimilarities are there? At the same time, an effort will be made that three other questions should also be answered in the text of the research: 1- Why was the issue of revision not mentioned in terms of method and manner in both constitutions from the very beginning? 2- How many times have each of the two constitutions been revised? 3- What method and mechanism did both constitutions choose for revision and in this analogy, how did each of them think about the quality of amendment and completion?In addition to being the political and legal products of their times, the basic laws also contain some similar foundations and methods that can be seen in the text of all of them. The mechanism of reviewing the constitution and amending it is one of the similarities that all the constitutions have dealt with in different ways. In this letter, an attempt has been made to point out the similarities and dissimilarities of the two constitutional laws and the Islamic Republic in the field of revision, amendment and revision by using the three criteria of process, content and method.In legal writings, there is not much hypothesizing, but the writer wants to prove that due to the comparative study, it is possible to draw a hypothesis regarding the inference from the comparison between two different categories, considering the different governance methods in the two periods of the monarchy and the republic, because only when It is a comparison that the researcher can achieve the qualitative superiority and inferiority of two compared categories. Constituent Assembly will be opened on Thursday, May 1, 1328And Mohammad Reza Shah stated the purpose of its formation as follows: failure to observe the principle of balance of the three powers in such a way that the executive branch could not live and last by relying on the legislative branch, and on the other hand, setting and approving a new principle in order to determine the way for Revision of the principles of the constitution, because the Shah wanted the means of supreme leadership of the state and the nation and monitoring the actions of the three powers, as well as taking care of the smooth flow of laws and regulations in the country by taking the right to simultaneously dissolve the National Council and the Senate, as well as Embed the mechanism of necessary revisions in the constitution.