Machine summary:
If we want to briefly say what this conflict has been throughout the history of religions, we must first clarify what is the relationship between reason and revelation? Prophets, especially prophets in Abrahamic religions - prophets like Moses (pbuh), Jesus (pbuh), Hazrat Khatami Marbat (pbuh) and other prophets like Zoroaster if we consider them as prophets - called humanity to God in a way and they claim that from They are from God and each of them has a special way and style;But the basis of all work is revelation. The prophets claim to have received truths from God intuitively or in the form of revelation and inspiration. The main issue that is raised is whether these two are different or not? Do these two say the same thing in all cases? Are these two distinct and incompatible essences or do they have a single essence? This question and the answer to it are very basic. Now, does an independent mindIt is independent and stands on its own feet, is it compatible with the revelation or not? How is such an intellect compatible with the revelation in which you must be pure submission? Reason claims to understand and understand independently, and there is no dispute at all in revelation, revelation is pure acceptance and pure faith. It is true that you consider the active intellect to be active in this world and you consider it as the world of elements according to Haji Kodkhodai, but the active intellect is also related to our intellects before itself.