Machine summary:
"Mr. Dr. Aghajari said that historiography is a mental re-creation, but I think it is more recognition and retelling, and by itself this concept finds its place in the heart of this definition, the discussion of re-creation that exists, but if we put forward the concept of re-creation, We have given the historian a kind of creativity and innovation and in fact the right to create history.There is one more point that I think I should definitely state in order to solve the problem that Dr. Akbari raised, this is that we have to change the principle of constitutional historiography after the Islamic Revolution because the discussions, views, analyzes and researches have changed at all. We cannot see in one sense what is in Kasravi's constitutional historyThis is happening on this side, the form of the discussion, the analysis of the discussion, and the alleged documents have become different, and in these differences, I emphasize the role of the imam himself. Here we now see a current that tries to find a root for the current of thought or actually its own records in the Islamic Revolution.In order to strengthen its base, from the perspective of this need, it has entered the arena of explaining and analyzing the history of constitutionalism, not from the perspective of a scientific movement, and this exists seriously; That is, the crux of the current political or ideological view of the category of past history, including the history of constitutionalism, is that, of course, the Islamic Revolution itself is seriously affected by this scourge.