Check it:
The author of the article discussed the Sunnah and consensus, considering that they are two proofs and sources of legislation. Then he presented the definition of the Sunnah, the evidence for the Sunnah, and its division into frequent reports, single reports, and definition. In the Sunnah, language and terminology, then it presents consensus: definition of consensus, evidence of consensus, evidence of the validity of consensus, Sections of consensus.
Machine summary:
“Knowledge does not occur to the judge, and what occurs is nothing more than suspicion, except that the aforementioned suspicion departs from the generality of the universal principle, which is the lack of validity of all Suspicion, and in light of this clarification, “suspect” is part of evidence and acknowledgment is evidence. As for doubt in the ordinary sense, It is the assumption in which the probability of agreement is greater than the probability of disagreement - for example, 75% agreement and 25% disagreement, and here the resulting revelation is not complete either.But if the Holy Law wants to give consideration to this suspicion and consider it an argument, it says that the suspicion resulting from evidence or admission is considered a complete revelation in the world of legislative consideration despite It is not a complete revelation in its formation, and as the late Mirza Al-Naini says - may God have mercy on him - The holy law or the wise people complete the revelation and make it a complete revelation. It seems that it is possible to combine the two opinions by saying: The Sheikh declared that the news of a single person is trustworthy if its narrator is an Imam and he is assured that the news is from the greatest Messenger (p. Or one of the Imams (peace be upon him) as proofWe do not accept the major or minor of this issue - on what issue other than the essentials (prayer, fasting, Hajj, etc.) has the nation agreed? And where did the Islamic nation, that is, all the schools of thought, scholars, non-scholars, scholars, scholars, and commoners agree? But if it is said that what is meant by the nation here is what the Sunnis say when they adhere to the narration, it is the Sunni scholars who, if they agree on a matter, will not be mistaken. Here we must say that the narrations on which they relied have not reached us, and therefore, by relying on their statements - which is the final consensus - we are certain that the opinion of the infallible one is this as well.