Abstract:
Epistemologists define knowledge as "justified honest belief". The skeptic says, knowledge with this definition is not possible to have an example, that is, knowledge is not really possible, and if knowledge with these characteristics also finds an example, we will not be aware of our knowledge, so no epistemological school can avoid the discussion of skepticism. The present article first defined skepticism in a simple way, then by referring to some types of skepticism, it focused its discussion on philosophical skepticism with arguments, and in the final part of the article, it examined and criticized the answers given to argumentative skeptics. Is.
 Machine summary:
"Since, by definition, a skeptical alternative is a proposition inconsistent with q but compatible with e, it follows from the mere existence of skeptical alternatives of the kind we have seen that the empirical propositions we normally claim to know, We don't know. Does error acceptance favor confiscation against skepticism? It should be remembered that what the skeptic claims,It is precisely that the existence of alternatives consistent with our evidence weakens our scientific claims. But this raises problems for indirectly clarifying the argument in favor of the appropriate alternatives view: some philosophers reject theories that affirm condition (s) on the very ground that it requires the falsity of the principle to remain in the realm of imperatives. In this way, we can find knowledge that the conventional world exists, and since we know that the assumption of the conventional world rejects skeptical alternatives,From the principle of staying in the realm of assumptions, science results in the falsity of skeptical alternatives. If skepticism is an extremely irrational view, then why do skeptical arguments attract our attention? Why directly, by objecting that, for example, skeptical assumptions are far from reality and too far-fetched to weaken our epistemological claims, (either we can know that skeptical alternatives are false, or we don't need to know things about the outside world in order to have knowledge about them) they are liars)