Abstract: The Assembly of Experts in the final review of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran for the year 1358 SH. During the discussion and review of the draft constitution, he did not mention the principle that shows the time, method and manner of revising the text of the constitution. until in the revision of 1368 Sh. The Constitution, the fourteenth chapter and the one hundred and seventy-seventh principle were dedicated to the time, method and manner of the appeal.
In this article, an attempt has been made to make a comparative study between the Assembly of Constitutional Law Experts and the Constitutional Law Revision Council in the field of the principle of appeal. In this passage, the four categories of the authority proposing and initiating the review, the composition of the members of the review council, the limits of the review, and the final approval of the review are mentioned.
Machine summary:After the preliminary investigations, the group decided to propose another principle instead of the draft article 148, which was discussed and discussed with number 1/73 in the sixty-third session of the parliament for the final review of the constitution: whenever the parliament of the National Council revises or He can consider it necessary to change one or more certain principles of the constitutionApprove the formation of the Assembly of Experts with the majority of two-thirds of the votes and approval of the leadership. "And this case shows that the leadership, due to the lack of a single and complete authority over all the affairs of the country and the army, which is caused by the scope of the work of governing a large country like Iran, wisely obliges itself to consult with the Expediency Council. The system seesBut on the other hand, paragraph 1 of Article 110 refers to the determination of the general policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran system by the leadership after consulting the Expediency Council. In the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, no such stipulation has been mentioned, and only the necessary cases have been mentioned, which can be included from one month to several years after its formulation and approval, and its recognition is the responsibility of the leadership after consulting with the recognition council. The expediency of the system has been laid.
Khalili,M. (2002). A comparative look at the revision of the 1358 Assembly of Experts and the 1368 Revision Council. Matin Research Journal, 3(13), 111-144.
MLA
Khalili,M. . "A comparative look at the revision of the 1358 Assembly of Experts and the 1368 Revision Council", Matin Research Journal, 3, 13, 2002, 111-144.
HARVARD
Khalili M. (2002). 'A comparative look at the revision of the 1358 Assembly of Experts and the 1368 Revision Council', Matin Research Journal, 3(13), pp. 111-144.
CHICAGO
M. Khalili, "A comparative look at the revision of the 1358 Assembly of Experts and the 1368 Revision Council," Matin Research Journal, 3 13 (2002): 111-144,
VANCOUVER
Khalili M. A comparative look at the revision of the 1358 Assembly of Experts and the 1368 Revision Council. Matin, 2002; 3(13): 111-144.